Brian, again I am sure much of this is info that you will already have, but there is a brief piece in the
Naval Chronicle volume 33 (1815), page 285, which mentions the earl’s involvement in the negotiations. He made an undertaking to pay the excess expenditure over £90,000 in the hope that it would be made good by an additional parliamentary grant. The excess amounted to £6,450 after including £3,000 for repairs.
The
Naval Chronicle refers to “
The Report of the Proceedings of Earl Nelson's Trustees”. This may be the same document as the “
Report of Henry Charles Litchfield, appointed by Trustees under an Act for settling and securing a certain Annuity on the Earl Nelson and the Heirs Male of his body and such persons to whom the title of Earl Neson may descend”. Do copies still exist?
(£30,000 of the original £120,000 had been used for pensions to Nelson’s sisters.)
The debate on the additional £9,000 grant by parliament can of course be found in Hansard.
In 1811 a letter in the
Naval Chronicle suggested that Earl Nelson was the cause of the delay in buying an estate. A ‘Naval Country Gentleman’ asked in a letter addressed to the Right Hon. Charles Philip Yorke, First Lord Commissioner of the Admiralty,
Quote:
why the mansion and estate voted to the Nelson family is yet unpurchased; a question which many have asked through the medium of the NAVAL CHRONICLE, and none have attempted to answer. The people cannot but perceive, that though the interest of the money voted by Parliament is more lucrative to the unambitious Earl than the produce of landed property would be, the family must ultimately be losers by the delay, and that £90,000. (for of the £100,000. granted by Parliament, £10,000. were to be applied to the immediate exigencies of Earl Nelson) will now purchase infinitely less land than that sum would have obtained in 1806, and the detriment to the family is progressively increasing with the increased value of real property. Condescend, Sir, through some channel, to gratify the public anxiety on these points, and allow us to hope that the individual preference of Earl Nelson shall no longer be permitted to operate to the permanent disadvantage of those who are to inherit the honours of his lamented brother.
Naval Chronicle volume 26 (1811), page 301