Anna,
I think there are a couple of factors which make it difficult to answer your question definitively. The Articles of War, for example – although they were in many ways more lenient than the criminal code on land – were crude in their definitions. Thus, ‘mutiny’ was the only way that anything other than minor disobedience to a superior could be described, whether it was the violent takeover of a ship as with the ‘Hermione’, a general strike like the events at Spithead, or merely publicly questioning an order about sail plan or course. Likewise the only way to describe a seaman (or officer) who was not present when his ship sailed was as a ‘deserter’, whether he had deliberately absconded, been accidentally detained by illness or by transport delays when getting from his home to the port, or had got so drunk that he forgot! And once ‘R’ had been entered against a person’s name it was extremely difficult to have it removed. It was only in the 1820s that the term ‘straggling’ was widely adopted to cover the lesser offence of being inadvertently AWOL, and punished by a stoppage of pay. This problem of definition makes it difficult to find reliable statistics about desertion, the circumstances, or steps that were taken to find the miscreants. However, steps were certaintly taken to contain it. The military, for example, guarded all acess points to the island on which Portsmouth was built and apprehended every likely seaman, detaining any that had no certificate to justify their absence from their ship. And many Captains Clerks appended detailed physical descriptions of each crew member in the Muster Roll, presuably so that if they 'Ran' they could be recognised. I have never heard however of adverts in the broadsheets advertising for information on deserters. One suspects that such things would have been promptly burned by an enraged populace. Another fsctor is that desertion was not confined to times of war when the press gang operated – although the maintenance of severe punishment was presumably designed to act as a deterrent when manpower was in short supply. It was also common (I might say normal) in times of peace when all men were volunteers. When ‘Doris’, for example, prepared for service in S America in 1821, of the 212 men raised in London and Chatham in April, 30 had managed to desert before the frigate finally sailed in July – some after only a few weeks service! Since they had all received the bounty, clothing and tobacco before they left, some officers concluded that there was a conspiracy among elements in the seafaring classes to falsely enlist and then do a bunk as soon as they had received the goodies. Significantly, the men clearly did not expect to be caught. However, in S America, ‘Doris’ continued to lose men, often in the most ridiculous circumstance - like jumping ship in the port of Recife when it was under siege, there was nowhere to escape to, and where a British seaman would have stood out like a sore thumb and recapture was inevitable. It is also worth pointing out that, on ‘Doris’, there was no correlation between desertion and previous punishment or rank, in that as many ABs tried to jump ship as Landsmen. The captain’s wife, Maria Graham reported that it was thought that some of these men had been given masses of booze and detained by crimps who expected a reward by turning them in; but it is difficult not to conclude that one factor in desertion at this time at any rate was that a number of British seamen were pretty feckless, short-sighted and easily bored!
Brian
|