Hi Tiltwick,
I’m afraid I know nothing about the manufacture of
cannon or the companies involved, so can’t be of much help to you there, but I was fascinated by the information on your website and the links from it. One thing that intrigued me was a description of how
cannon were bored, which was by turning the
cannon itself (at speed by water power), rather than turning the rod/drill used to bore it. It had never occurred to me that it was done that way round, but I suppose the momentum of the spinning
cannon made it a much more reliable method. What amazing ingenuity!
I would be very interested to know Anthony Munford’s source for the information that 79 of the Victory’s 104
cannon at Trafalgar were made by Walker and Company. The
hms-victory.com website, here, confirms that when guns were put into a ship, a record was made of the manufacturers name and the gun's individual number, but they do not seem to have that information for the guns on board at Trafalgar. It makes the point that only twelve of the guns on board today date from the Napoleonic wars. Ten of these were cast by Walker & Company, but are not the guns that were on board at Trafalgar, having been put on board in 1808 after the Victory’s repair. Peter Goodwin, when describing the Victory’s armament, references the document
‘ADM 160/154 Returns of ordnance on H.M. Ships. 1803-1812’. If you can get to the National Archives, it would be worth checking this to see whether it provides that level of detail for the Victory and for other ships.
By the way, I am a little confused by the arithmetic at
hms-victory.com. The Victory’s broadside weight at Trafalgar is quoted at 1148 lbs, but the guns listed add up to only 1144 lbs (after dividing by 2 for one side only). In that case the error is easily explained by the 68 pounder carronades being incorrectly listed as 64-pounders, but the broadside weight of the 1803 armament is listed as 1092 lbs, whereas the list of guns adds up to 1112 lbs, which is 20 lbs more. Can anyone explain the discrepancy?
An analysis of the firepower of British ships at Trafalgar provides some surprises. The Victory’s firepower was less than that of the 3rd-rate large 74-gun ship, Belleisle, which at one time so bristled with carronades (fourteen 32-pounders and eight 24-pounders) that she actually carried 86 guns. And with 24-pounder long guns on the upper gun deck (rather than 18-pounders) she had a total broadside weight of 1178 lbs, and although her armament at Trafalgar may have varied from this (William James even suggested 90 guns and 1284 lbs broadside), I am sure it is one of the reasons she was one of Collingwood’s leading ships. By contrast, the 74-gun Minotaur’s armament when not equipped with carronades was only 781 lbs.